(Solution) C361 XAP1 — XAP TASK 1

INTRODUCTION

There are many sources of information available on the web and in journals relating to the nursing discipline. Therefore, it is of pivotal importance to understand the basic tenets of critical appraisal of research for its use in interprofessional healthcare practices. The aim of evidence-based practice (EBP) is to employ a three-pronged approach, blending the best available research evidence, patient values and preferences, and clinical expertise.

In this task, you will critique two primary research evidence sources. You will select one quantitative and one qualitative peer-reviewed journal article on a healthcare topic of interest.

REQUIREMENTS

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. 

Note: Research evidence must not be more than five years old.

Note: Upload a copy of the full text of the articles with your submission.

Note: You may use the same topic and research articles on both Task 1: Analyzing Research Articles and Task 2: Evidence-Based Practice Change.

A.  Evaluate a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infections in hospitals. 

1.  Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article:

  • background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study)
  • review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study)
  • data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data)
  • methodology (e.g., research type and sampling methods)

2.  Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part A1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.

3.  Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the journal article from part A.

4.  Describe one strength and one limitation of the study.

5.  Describe how the evidence from the article in part A informs current nursing practices.

B.  Evaluate a primary, qualitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infections in hospitals. You may use the same topic that was used in part A.

1.  Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article:

  •  background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study)
  •  review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study)
  •  data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data)
  •  methodology (e.g., research type and sampling methods)

2.  Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part B1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.

3.  Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the journal article from part B.

4.  Identify one strength and one limitation of the study.

5.  Describe how the evidence from the article in part B informs current nursing practices.

C.  Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

D.  Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

Solution:

Evidence Table

A1. Quantitative Article:

Christina, R, B. S. N., Christine, W, M. S. N., & Yanwen, Ph.D., M. S. (2016). Tailoring Education to Perceived Fall Risk in Hospitalized Patients With Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Clinical journal of oncology nursing20(1), 84. doi:10.1188/16.CJON

Background or Introduction

 

In this part, Christina et al provide provided background information increased risk of falls among patients suffering from cancer.  This section also provides the aim of this study. Specifically, the researchers articulate the primary aim of this study is to explore the effect of tailored, nurse-delivered interventions in the prevention of falls among patients suffering from cancer. The study also explores the impact of these interventions on the willingness of the patients to ask for assistance.
Review of the Literature Despite the fact that this section has been incorporated into other parts of the article, the researchers have examined a myriad of past studies on the effect of tailored, nurse-delivered interventions in the prevention of falls among patients suffering from cancer. Taking this into consideration, the researchers have considered examining various past studies related to patient’s falls among cancer patients and how they can be addressed amicably. For instance, the researchers in this study have cited many scholars including Lloyd (2011), Stevens and Phelan (2013), Tzeng and Yin (2012)
Discussion of Methodology The researchers in this part have reported the methods and techniques used in the data collection.  To be precise, in this study, a two-group, prospective, randomized test was used in testing the intervention in convenience of 91 adult patients within the bone marrow transplant unit. However, given the project drop-out rate of 5%, 88 individuals were required to take part in the study, with 44 in the intervention group and 44 in the control group. In the end, 91 patients participated in the study, with 47 (N=47) in the control group, and 44 (N=44) in the intervention group. Out of the 91 participants, 54 were female while 37 were male.

Please click the icon below to purchase full answer at only $15